HomeoNetix carries Kent, Knerr and Boenninghausen's Characteristics — close to 250,000 rubrics — alongside twelve classical materia medica titles. What makes it different from a standalone repertory is where the work happens: you chart from symptoms already recorded in the consultation, and the finished run is saved to that patient and carried into the next follow-up.
The repertories ship with every plan, at no extra cost per practitioner:
Kent marks in three grades, Knerr in four, Boger in five. Rescaling them onto a common scale would quietly change the weight of a remedy in a chart, so HomeoNetix keeps each book’s own grading and charts one repertory at a time rather than summing across books that were never built to be added together.
This is a deliberate constraint. A chart that mixes repertories looks more thorough and means less — the totals stop corresponding to anything a practitioner could verify by hand.
In most repertory tools you retype the symptoms you have already written into the case record. Here the rubrics come from the consultation itself, and the chart lives on the patient afterwards.
Once a chart narrows the field, the differentiation happens in the materia medica. HomeoNetix includes twelve classical titles, all public domain, readable without leaving the consultation:
The repertory and materia medica are clinical surfaces, so they follow the same access rule as case records: doctors see them, front-desk and pharmacy roles do not. Repertorisation itself is doctor-only. Nothing here consumes AI credits — charting is unmetered, however much you use it.
Three: Kent's Repertory of the Homoeopathic Materia Medica (68,739 rubrics), Knerr's Repertory of Hering's Guiding Symptoms (151,107 rubrics), and Boenninghausen's Characteristics and Repertory by Boger (29,896 rubrics) — close to 250,000 rubrics covering nearly 4,000 remedies. All three are included in every plan.
No, and that is deliberate. Each repertory uses its own grading scale — Kent 1–3, Knerr 1–4, Boger 1–5 — so adding scores across books produces a total that does not correspond to anything you could check by hand. You chart in one repertory at a time, with its native grades intact.
No. Repertorisation is unmetered — the chart is computed from the rubric grades in the books, not from an AI model. AI credits are consumed only by miasm and case analysis, which are separate features.
It is stored on the case exactly as you saw it, with the rubrics, grades and remedy totals frozen. At the next follow-up you can carry it forward and build a new chart beside it, so you can see how the picture shifted between visits. Charts can also be exported to PDF or attached to the patient record.
No. The repertories and the materia medica library are included in the plan and available to every doctor on the account, with no per-practitioner repertory licence.
Not yet. HomeoNetix currently charts with Kent, Knerr and Boger's Boenninghausen's Characteristics. Boenninghausen's Therapeutic Pocket Book is public domain and on the roadmap, but it is not loaded today and we would rather say so than list a book you cannot chart with.
✓ Free guided demo ✓ Onboarding in a day ✓ Made in India