Where HomeoNetix fits — and where it doesn’t
Most “AI homeopathy software” is really an AI repertory: you search rubrics in plain language and get remedy suggestions. That is genuinely useful, and tools like Similia do it well. HomeoNetix carries a repertory too — Kent, Knerr and Boger — but it sits inside the case rather than beside it, which is the actual difference. You repertorise from symptoms you have already recorded, and the chart stays on the patient record instead of being retyped into a separate tool and lost.
- Repertorisation from the case — rubrics come from the symptoms you recorded, and the saved chart carries into the next follow-up so you can compare runs over time.
- AI that explains its reasoning — every remedy suggestion comes with written classical justification and a miasmatic picture, not just a name or a confidence percentage.
- A complete case, not a query — the analysis runs on the full Complete Symptom totality you recorded, and is saved on the case for later review.
- Direction of cure over time — miasm scoring and Hering's Law tracking across follow-ups, so you can verify whether the case is genuinely improving.
- The clinic, not just the consult — appointments, live OPD queue, follow-up due-lists, multi-branch, staff roles, billing and WhatsApp prescriptions in one system.
Where a dedicated repertory tool still wins is breadth of books. We carry three repertories, chosen because they are the ones most Indian practitioners actually chart with; if you work across many repertories, a specialist tool will serve that better. If your bottleneck is documenting cases, tracking chronic patients and running the clinic — with repertorisation as part of that, not apart from it — that is exactly what HomeoNetix is built for.